<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Has Lost Its Way, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oddlytogether.com/2009/06/microsoft-has-lost-its-way-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oddlytogether.com/2009/06/microsoft-has-lost-its-way-part-1/</link>
	<description>Things That Just Fit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:54:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Has Lost Its Way, Part 2 &#171; Oddly Together</title>
		<link>http://www.oddlytogether.com/2009/06/microsoft-has-lost-its-way-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Has Lost Its Way, Part 2 &#171; Oddly Together</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joewilcox.com/?p=1390#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>[...] single post, but felt compelled to break it in two, because of the more than 2,000-word length. The first part focused on Microsoft&#8217;s past, while this one addresses the present and future. If you want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] single post, but felt compelled to break it in two, because of the more than 2,000-word length. The first part focused on Microsoft&#8217;s past, while this one addresses the present and future. If you want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billybob</title>
		<link>http://www.oddlytogether.com/2009/06/microsoft-has-lost-its-way-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>billybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joewilcox.com/?p=1390#comment-584</guid>
		<description>Word DOC files.

AJAX is not a standard at all.  Microsoft get points for accidentally inventing XMLHTTPRequest (only to try to replace it with their own special standard).

AJAX just means &#039;using XMLHTTPRequest with XML&#039; - I find it easier and less resource intensive to use JSON instead of XML most of the time so AJAX is really just a marketing term for what we used to call DHTML.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word DOC files.</p>
<p>AJAX is not a standard at all.  Microsoft get points for accidentally inventing XMLHTTPRequest (only to try to replace it with their own special standard).</p>
<p>AJAX just means &#8216;using XMLHTTPRequest with XML&#8217; &#8211; I find it easier and less resource intensive to use JSON instead of XML most of the time so AJAX is really just a marketing term for what we used to call DHTML.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.oddlytogether.com/2009/06/microsoft-has-lost-its-way-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joewilcox.com/?p=1390#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Microsoft does champion SOAP, XML, WS-* and AJAX. But, no, these technologies don&#039;t particularly favour Microsoft&#039;s technology - they are all published standards (or in the case of AJAX, a collection of standards, including XMLHttpRequest). Microsoft has contributed significantly to many of these standards.

When you said &quot;DOC&quot; did you mean &quot;DOM&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft does champion SOAP, XML, WS-* and AJAX. But, no, these technologies don&#8217;t particularly favour Microsoft&#8217;s technology &#8211; they are all published standards (or in the case of AJAX, a collection of standards, including XMLHttpRequest). Microsoft has contributed significantly to many of these standards.</p>
<p>When you said &#8220;DOC&#8221; did you mean &#8220;DOM&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billybob</title>
		<link>http://www.oddlytogether.com/2009/06/microsoft-has-lost-its-way-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>billybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joewilcox.com/?p=1390#comment-582</guid>
		<description>You mention that Sir Tim Berners-Lee got some Finnish award but forgot to mention that he was Knighted and received the Order of Merit for his contributions.  Personally I would say that ranks above a Nobel Prize.

On a technical note, you say that MS championed SOAP and XML which favoured it&#039;s technologies, but that could not be more wrong.  XML and SOAP are not MS specific at all.  The technologies/standards which drove Microsoft were ActiveX, JScript, MSHTML and DOC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention that Sir Tim Berners-Lee got some Finnish award but forgot to mention that he was Knighted and received the Order of Merit for his contributions.  Personally I would say that ranks above a Nobel Prize.</p>
<p>On a technical note, you say that MS championed SOAP and XML which favoured it&#8217;s technologies, but that could not be more wrong.  XML and SOAP are not MS specific at all.  The technologies/standards which drove Microsoft were ActiveX, JScript, MSHTML and DOC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Has Lost Its Way, Part 2 &#171; Joe Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://www.oddlytogether.com/2009/06/microsoft-has-lost-its-way-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Has Lost Its Way, Part 2 &#171; Joe Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joewilcox.com/?p=1390#comment-581</guid>
		<description>[...] single post, but felt compelled to break it in two, because of the more than 2,000-word length. The first part focused on Microsoft&#8217;s past, while this one addresses the present and future. If you want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] single post, but felt compelled to break it in two, because of the more than 2,000-word length. The first part focused on Microsoft&#8217;s past, while this one addresses the present and future. If you want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
